In the mid-1970s, a new game called Dungeons&Dragons came on the market. Fantasy themes in the game had led researchers to study, or refute, claims of the general population about the harmful and negative impact of the game. With the increasing availability of the Internet in the world and the existence of successful series such as The Big Bang Theory and Stranger Things, the game has experienced a new surge of popularity. Researches have again taken an interest in studying the impact of this kind of games, focusing more on the benefits that these games have. The aim of this study was to examine differences between the RPG players of the Dungeons&Dragons game and non-players on individual characteristics of self-efficacy, empathy and social provisions. Previous research on these constructs has yielded conflicting results or has not yet been studied using quantitative methods. The study involved 136 players of the Dungeons&Dragons game and 140 participants who were non-players. All participants completed the Socio-Demographic Questionnaire, the General Self-Efficacy Scale (Ivanov i Penezić, 2002), Short Version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-28) (Wertag i Hanzec, 2016) and the Social Provisions Scale (Nekić, 2008). The results of the analyses showed that there are differences between players and non-players, with players having higher scores in levels of self-efficacy, emotional reactivity and social provisions compared to non-players. Players' playing time was not associated with higher levels of self-efficacy, cognitive empathy, emotional reactivity or social provisions. The implications of the results are given and guidelines for future research are offered. The results of this research can be used to further explore benefits of role-playing games and to support their application outside its entertainment function, for example in interventions, therapeutic processes and education.