prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke
Rad je dostupan svim korisnicima iz sustava znanosti i visokog obrazovanja RH
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke
International journal of rehabilitation research, 40 (2017), 3; 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233
Goljar, Nika; Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić, Tea; Baniček-Šoša, Ivanka; Albensi, Caterina; Burger, Helena; Franchighoni, Franco

Citirajte ovaj rad

Goljar, N., Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, T., Baniček Šoša, I., Albensi, C., Burger, H. i Franchighoni, F. (2017). Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke. International journal of rehabilitation research, 40. (3), 31-39. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233

Goljar, Nika, et al. "Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke." International journal of rehabilitation research, vol. 40, br. 3, 2017, str. 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233

Goljar, Nika, Tea Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, Ivanka Baniček Šoša, Caterina Albensi, Helena Burger i Franco Franchighoni. "Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke." International journal of rehabilitation research 40, br. 3 (2017): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233

Goljar, N., et al. (2017) 'Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke', International journal of rehabilitation research, 40(3), str. 31-39. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233

Goljar N, Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić T, Baniček Šoša I, Albensi C, Burger H, Franchighoni F. Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke. International journal of rehabilitation research [Internet]. 2017. [pristupljeno 10.05.2024.];40(3):31-39. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233

N. Goljar, T. Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, I. Baniček Šoša, C. Albensi, H. Burger i F. Franchighoni, "Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke", International journal of rehabilitation research, vol. 40, br. 3, str. 31-39, 2017. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:618802. [Citirano: 10.05.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:618802
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Rasch validation and comparison of Slovenian, Croatian and Italian versions of the Mini- BESTest in people with subacute stroke
AutorNika Goljar
AutorTea Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić
AutorIvanka Baniček-Šoša
AutorCaterina Albensi
AutorHelena Burger
AutorFranco Franchighoni
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Medicinski fakultet
(Katedra za rehabilitacijsku i sportsku medicinu)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Fizikalna medicina i rehabilitacija
Sažetak (engleski)
We wished to verify by Rasch Analysis if the Mini-BESTest, a balance measure, confirms its main psychometric properties in people with subacute stroke undergoing rehabilitation in three different countries (Slovenia, Croatia, and Italy), and to examine the stability of item hierarchy and difficulty across the three national versions through a differential item functioning analysis (DIF). We investigated 159 subjects with subacute stroke consecutively admitted to three rehabilitation facilities after screening for an intensive, tailored rehabilitation program. Balance function was tested within 36 hours from admission, and after ∼ 25 days. As no DIF was found between admission and discharge data or among countries, all data were pooled. Rasch criteria for the functioning of rating scale categories were fulfilled. Concerning internal construct validity, all items except item #14 (Cognitive Get Up & Go ; infit value= 1.42) showed an acceptable fit to the Rasch model. The patient ability-item difficulty matching was very good. Reliability indices were high. The Principal Component Analysis of standardized residuals confirmed the unidimensionality of the test. Based on the item calibration, raw scores of the Mini- BESTest were transformed into linear estimates of dynamic balance and six statistically detectable levels of balance ability were defined. Good psychometric features of the Mini-BESTest were confirmed. The three different national versions showed stability in item hierarchy, indicating equivalence of their cross-cultural adaptations. Problems with item # 14 in these patients warrant further study.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaInternational journal of rehabilitation research
Brojčani podacivol. 40, br. 3, str. 31-39
p-ISSN0342-5282
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000233
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:618802
Datum objave publikacije2017
URL dokumentahttp://bib.irb.hr/946997
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOgraničen pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-03-04 13:30:10