prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models
  Preuzmi
PDF 981.46 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13 (2024), 3; 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030730
Petrović, Valentina; Šlaj, Martina; Buljan, Mia; Čivljak, Tadej; Zulijani, Ana; Perić, Berislav

Citiranost:
,
Citirajte ovaj rad

Petrović, V., Šlaj, M., Buljan, M., Čivljak, T., Zulijani, A. i Perić, B. (2024). Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13. (3). doi: 10.3390/jcm13030730

Petrović, Valentina, et al. "Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models." Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, br. 3, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030730

Petrović, Valentina, Martina Šlaj, Mia Buljan, Tadej Čivljak, Ana Zulijani i Berislav Perić. "Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models." Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, br. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030730

Petrović, V., et al. (2024) 'Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models', Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(3). doi: 10.3390/jcm13030730

Petrović V, Šlaj M, Buljan M, Čivljak T, Zulijani A, Perić B. Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 26.01.2024. [pristupljeno 22.03.2025.];13(3). doi: 10.3390/jcm13030730

V. Petrović, M. Šlaj, M. Buljan, T. Čivljak, A. Zulijani i B. Perić, "Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models", Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, br. 3, Siječanj 2024. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:843189. [Citirano: 22.03.2025.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:127:843189
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Comparison of Tooth Size Measurements in Orthodontics Using Conventional and 3D Digital Study Models
AutorValentina Petrović
AutorMartina Šlaj
AutorMia Buljan
AutorTadej Čivljak
AutorAna Zulijani
AutorBerislav Perić
Autorova ustanova(Klinička bolnica Dubrava)
Autorova ustanova(Klinički bolnički centar Osijek)
Autorova ustanova(Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka)
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Stomatološki fakultet
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Dentalna medicina
Sažetak (engleski)
(1) Background: The objective of this study was to assess which digitization method produces the biggest deviation in the 3D images of tooth size from plaster models made using alginate impressions, which are considered the gold standard in orthodontics. (2) Methods: The sample used in this study included 30 subjects (10 males and 20 females). Measurements were made on four types of models: (1) digital models obtained through intraoral scanning and digitized models of plaster cast made from (2)... Više alginate impressions, (3) silicone impressions, and (4) conventional plaster models. Mesio-distal (MD) and buccal/labial–lingual/palatal (BL) dimensions were measured on the reference teeth of the right side of the jaw (central incisor, canine, first premolar, and first molar). Comparisons of tooth size between the methods were conducted using a repeated measurement analysis of variance and the Friedman test, while the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine agreement between the different methods. (3) Results: The results showed a similar level of agreement between the conventional and digital models in both jaws and the anterior, middle, and posterior segments. Better agreement was found for the MD measurements (r = 0.337–0.798; p ≤ 0.05) compared to the BL measurements (r = 0.016–0.542), with a smaller mean difference for MD (0.001–0.50 mm) compared to BL (0.02–1.48 mm) and a smaller measurement error for MD (0.20–0.39) compared to BL (0.38–0.89). There was more frequently a better level of agreement between 3D images than measurements made using a digital caliper on the plaster models with 3D images. (4) Conclusions: The differences in measurements between the digital models and conventional plaster models were small and clinically acceptable. Sakrij dio sažetka
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaJournal of Clinical Medicine
Brojčani podacivol. 13, br. 3, 730
e-ISSN2077-0383
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030730
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:127:843189
Datum objave publikacije2024-01-26
URL dokumentahttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/3/730
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2024-03-04 11:54:17
accessibility

closePristupačnostrefresh

Ako želite spremiti trajne postavke, kliknite Spremi, ako ne - vaše će se postavke poništiti kad zatvorite preglednik.