Ovaj radi bavi se raznim aspektima ugovora kojima stranke ugovaraju nadležnost Arbitražnog suda za sport za odlučivanje u njihovoj pravnoj stvari, kao i pojavnim oblicima arbitražnih ugovora – kako je propisano, kakav je stav u svojim odlukama zauzeo CAS i kako se o valjanosti takvih ugovora izjasnio Švicarski federalni sud u nekoliko svojih najrelevantnijih odluka. Namjera ovog rada jest ukazati na probleme s kojima se stranke pro futuro mogu susresti, uvođenjem subjektivnih interpretativnih kategorija (od strane tribunala) kao elemenata u strogo formalni zakonski akt, te ponuditi određene alternative nekim postupovnim principima ustanovljenima kroz praksu Švicarskog federalnog suda.; This paper deals with the various aspects of contracts by which the parties agree on jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport to decide their legal matter, as well as with the various manifestations of arbitration agreements - as prescribed by law; in regards to the CAS legal reasoning and the Swiss federal courts decision on the validity of such contracts in few of its most relevant cases. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the problems that parties may face pro futuro by introducing subjective interpretative categories (by tribunals) as elements in a strictly formal legal act, and to offer certain alternatives to some procedural principles established through the case law of the Swiss Federal Court.