Predmet su rada rasprave o odnosu determinizma i slobode volje (tj. problem kompatibilnosti), odnosno implikacije koje imaju po moralnu odgovornost. Problemu se pristupa iz naturalističke perspektive iako se ne nudi odgovor na pitanje istine kauzalnog determinizma. Međutim, s ciljem da se ispita perspektiva za moralnu odgovornost, pretpostavlja se da je kauzalni determinizam potkrijepljen znanošću. Razmatra se pojam kauzalnog determinizma, a potom se ispituju izazovi koje argument konzekvenci postavlja pred slobodu volje shvaćenu kao mogućnost da se učini drugačije. Cilj je rada pokazati da su u osnovi svakodnevne upotrebe pojma moralne odgovornosti slabiji uvjeti od slobode shvaćene kao mogućnosti da se učini drugačije. Na tim temeljima branimo zaključak da je moralna odgovornost kompatibilna s kauzalnim determinizmom.; This paper deals with the discussions concerning the relationship between determinism and free will (i.e. the Problem of Compatibility), and correspondingly, with the implications for moral responsibility. It approaches the problem from the naturalistic perspective, albeit it does not answer the issue of the truth of causal determinism. For the sake of exploring the prospects for moral responsibility, the paper assumes causal determinism is scientifically warranted. Starting from the concept of causal determinism, the paper examines the challenges for the concept of free will as an ability to act otherwise, invoked by the Consequence Argument. The goal is to demonstrate that requirements for the ordinary moral responsibility conception are weaker than freedom as the ability to act otherwise. On these grounds, it is concluded that moral responsibility and causal determinism are compatible.