Ovaj rad temelji se na istraživanju višečlanih izraza izvučenih iz korpusa obrazaca engleskih ugovora s pomoću programskog alata Wordsmith Tools 6.0. (Scott 2012). Analizom semantičkog odnosa između sastavnica engleskih višečlanih izraza nastoje se predložiti prijevodni ekvivalenti na hrvatskom jeziku. Pri istoznačnom je odnosu riječ o ponavljanju značenja zbog povijesnih ili fonoloških razloga ili pak žanrovskih konvencija, pa se u radu zauzima stav da se takvi izrazi u hrvatskome jeziku mogu svesti na manji broj sastavnica. U izraza u kojih je semantički odnos između sastavnica druge naravi (primjerice, komplementaran), potrebno je dobro proučiti širi i izvanjezični kontekst izraza da bi se utvrdilo može li se primijeniti isti stupanj redukcije ili je potrebno zadržati isti jezični niz i u ciljnom jeziku; This paper investigates multinomial expressions extracted from the corpus of English contract samples by means of Wordsmith Tools 6.0 (Scott 2012). By analysing the semantic relationship between the constituents of English multinomial expressions, the paper attempts to suggest translation equivalents in Croatian. If constituents are synonymous, motivation for such semantic repetition can be found in history, phonology or genre-related factors. Since these reasons do not apply in the target language, multinomial expressions can be reduced to a lesser number of constituents in Croatian. If multinomial expressions are motivated by other semantic reasons, such as contiguity or hyponymy, it is only rarely that we can omit one of their constituents. This is when we need to study the wider (Sinclair 2004) and the extralinguistic context to find out whether deletions are allowed (Šarčević 1997) or whether we have to retain the same word string in the target language. Results suggest that the language used in English contracts still tends to favour binomials proper (Kopaczyk 2009) despite the centuries-long urging for simplicity in legal language. As a result, we find many instances of doubling, which may be translated by means of single units into Croatian. Other multinomial expressions tend to be motivated by other semantic reasons, such as hyponymy, but, although a hyponym encompasses the whole semantic field and includes the meaning of other constituents as well, we are not allowed to omit constituents, for they contribute to the all-inclusiveness and preciseness of legal language. Finally, by examining the wider context of these expressions, we can develop the most suitable translation equivalent, since very often it is the wider context that helps us reveal whether the order of constituents may be disrupted or needs to be retained.